Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheEasyRun
Righto Chrome and Filante. Enough of your misquote's.
Read the following sentence below that I wrote in the original post again, then read the misquote's you both posted, and get a grip on the figures on which you are twisting around.
" Here is another fact, if the average man clears $30,000 a year in his regular employment, then to match that in punting earnings, he can start off with a bank as little as $4000. And still keep his job. Nirvana for the average bloke on the punt would be around $50,000 a year.....roughly $4000 to $5000 a month. A $6000 starting bank for that is plenty. "
The very reason you two can not smell the roses is that your both stuck in a void of numerical system punting that even with a massive turnover, simply does not produce enough profit for the average man to live on. They do not work. They cannot. Why will be explained in Part 3. And for cristsake do not misquote anything out of it.
What you call 'my drivel' is in reality race punting law.
|
The EasyRun,
I did not call what you wrote drivel, I just challenged the mathematics of it - it simply didn't add up. I can challenge what you've written without twisting what you said.
The very reason I cannot smell the roses is that I broke my nose in a car accident and lost 90% of the sense of smell - no other reason.
Rather than myself or Filante misquoting, it seems you are now backpeddling rather than explaining how it can be done and posting hard numbers.
The reason why is that the numbers just don't add up.
Don't get me wrong, much of what you have posted is excellent, the rest leaves a very large question mark.
I am often amused that others can make decisions on what sort of punter another person is, just by going on what they've posted on a forum.
Let me tell you that I am not just a system punter. There are many facets which make up my punting.
I use systems.
I handicap.
I follow horses that are on a watchlist.
I use other methods and lay horses as well.
I enjoy systems immensely, but that is nowhere near an accurate description of the overall picture. I believe there is a place for everything in this game, providing you can identify an edge.
Amazingly, most of my systems are actually based on sound handicapping principles - imagine that!
The common misconception seems to be that a system punter is one that relies on longshots or bets numbers or follows jockeys or trainers or similar, again, that is way off base.
There is no misquote at all - you stated that to match $30,000 per annum, all you need is a $4,000 bank.
It still doesn't add up how you word it.