A bit more mis -direction there chrome [implying because they were losing]?
You know very well why I stopped my thread 'off crash's cuff' and so does everyone else. And by the way, if you check the closing figures the POT was just over 20% [flat stakes] for a lot of 'real' bets posted in advance.

Yes, some maths were involved in the selection process but mostly good old fashioned handicapping but with a modern high tec. flavour, that the Internet age has made possible.

Anyway, this thread has been great fun [a soap opera?]. All of my posts generally and to anyone in particular have been tongue in cheek [and gee em up] comments. The thread has been a breath of fresh air for this punter at least.

I doubt we will hear more from our mysterious thread starter or his punting secrets. Fact is, in the end profitable punting involves a lot of subjective judgment at some point in the process, because for every known fact you can put a definite value on, there are 10 more you can't and that's were this game becomes an art, not a science.

If our mysterious punter had finished this thread with his part II or even part III, there would be a lot of disappointment here anyway. Nobody can put down in print [or formula] in a punting thread that second and most important part of punting ...the art of it.

Cheers.