2nd October 2006, 09:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,434
|
|
crash in your haste to disagree with me, I think you missed the point.
I agree that most of Beadman's mounts are unders - no argument there.
But not all of them are unders, his mounts over distances of 2200m plus return a very healthy POT and strike rate - because jockey instinct, rating and positioning a horse are most important over distance.
The figures prove that he wins more than the odds available over distance, therefore his mounts over distance are not unders.
This was considering all mounts either first or second favourite only.
I didn't even hone it down to his pet tracks which boost the strike rate enormously.
Crash, I'll post Beadman's Best in another thread for the coming 12 months, but I still think you just come back with "that proves nothing" as is always the case.
|