Hey wes, just a couple of questions regarding your neural info, do you find that the CRS points are alot more accurate for some tracks as against others? It would seem to me that if you find a horse with a poor record at a particular track , then you may as well ignore their CPand Cf figures as well even if they are quite high.The more I look at the neurals, the more I tend to think that you would really need to apply a different setting on a track by track and distance by distance basis, does your info tend to support my theory? I also think it is more relevent to use rankings rather than actual points. Also could you run through how to get past neural results thanks, I know it was on a thread somewherebut cant seem to find it>