Sorry Bhagwan, didn't mean to offend, but fitted rules on past results seldom keep on winning. Exact rules, such as finishing between 4th & 9th last start just make no sense. Why would you prefer to back a horse that ran 4th of 4, beaten say 20 lengths, over a horse that either won, or ran 10th of 20 beaten 2 lengths, simply because the "rules" say so?