Hi AngryPixie,

Thanks for your comments, if I can take your comments one at a time and answer them in the order that they were made, just helps my concentration and to answer everything.

I agree that a given set of figures is essential for further reference and yours are the ones to go with.

Novice Punter, Novice there is a long story of why I chose that name, much too long to put here, I will explain whenever my PM is enabled, if you wish.

Analogue source, to be totally honest, and im not ashamed to admit it, I have had to ask someone what that means. Its too tech for me, just wouldn’t have the patience or the skill to attempt a mission like that, patience for a lot of things and other people but not that kind of stuff. Im a hands person, if I cant do it with my hands forget it, if you do a search for 22-RB on the net you will see what I mean.

2.00 instead of 1/1, its only since last year that I got to grips with fractional odds, in Ireland and UK it is the way the odds are quoted every day, in the bookies anyway.
I will make a separate sheet with the odds showing the decimal. Decimals really confuse me but with a little bit of effort might even surprise myself.

US races, my selections are all turf in UK. Flat and Jumps only, I don’t like AW racing too unpredictable although the race type I mentioned in previous post is AW, but at this time it seems to be worth a longer look over last year.

As I mentioned in another post my system is SP based just at the off and in certain race types, as much as I would like to post I cant.

Having gotten all that off my chest if I may refer to my very first post, it stated.

“This is not a selection system nor is it a staking plan.

This is an attempt to devise a method to get through long losing runs.

My idea is to see if an ideal number “divisor” can be found to reduce bank loses for any strike rate.

Everybody has their own way of making their selections and preferences for staking plans.

A problem in common to most punters if not all, is the inevitable long losing run.

A loss recovery plan is part of my idea not everybody’s cuppa, but, each to his own.

There has been lots of work in this area before and I’m sure mine won’t be the last.


I use groups of 6 runners to win X and recover loses.

6 losses terminate a group or a win when it happens.

Whatever is lost on a losing group of 6 is left behind.

This cut off is necessary.

Start new group.

The original plan was to find:

1. Ideal number of bets to put together to get through the long losing runs without stretching the bank too much. 6 seems to be the ideal number for this set of results.

2. To see if anything could get near the Level Stakes ideal and to make the same profit. “

Some of the posts from some of the members would seem to indicate that this is an attack on Level Stakes, its not, the plan is to win the same amount on the same horse as Levels does plus recover the losses left behind using the Level Stakes plan.

The 6 idea that is proposed is to ensure that that profit is maximized.

Surely profit is the name of the game, not an ideal.


Sorry its a bit long winded.


Regards and Respect


Kevin

Novice Punter