24th August 2003, 08:41 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Queensland
Posts: 28
|
|
Quote:
On 2003-08-24 18:27, Mr. Logic wrote:
I have my doubts about there being any major bias at Caulfield yesterday. Just because a few leaders won early does not automatically make it a biased track and hard on the rails the place to be. Brief Embrace didn't have any problems making up lengths out wide in the straight to win. Or has the bias suddenly changed from hard on the rails to out wide in the straight?
|
Mr. Logic, The sooner punters dismiss this track bias as absolute bull**** the sooner they will start backing more winners.The bias is caused by the speed of the leaders and has nothing whatsoever to do with the track.The bias experts failed to comment on the first and last races at Caulfield when both winners came from near last.No wonder 98% are losing. |