Legion,

If [other peoples] "accuracy" of opinion is an issue, what next? Peoples spelling [mine is terrible]?

Some accuracy of your own then might not go astray.

If you had have read all the threads in this forum here, you would know that I am not a place bet man. I have been trying an experiment for the past two weeks [1wx4p] as you would have seen by my last two Sunday's "for what it's worth" post and what I have written in other threads. That exercise is now over.

As for having a go [ by obvious innuendo] at my strike rate, well my runs are on the board for all to see [and yours?]. Anyone who has the courage to posts tips here has nobody to answer to.

Anyway, This forum is not a competion nor a place to have to prove any sort of accuracy in "meaning" to anybody. If I want to say 7 out of 10 odds-on bets are peanuts in my opinion [and those bets were over months I might add and that was the context of my point], then I can because {most] people realize that I am expressing my opinion only.
You are free to disagree but only God has ownership of what is "accurate" opinion or what is the value of "peanuts" and if in "my opinion" Lonhro was unders and the race was open, then that is my opinion [and that of others too by the way including the Trainers foreman] and I am free to express it, arn't I?

Our views all differ [thank God] and the forum needs no accuracy of opinion Policeman so I'll agree to disagree with you ok?
We should also remember that this thread was created regarding the Warwick Stakes so if you feel so strongly about "accuracy" perhaps you should start you own thread on the subject.

Cheers.

[ This Message was edited by: crash on 2003-08-30 11:46 ]

[ This Message was edited by: crash on 2003-08-30 13:07 ]