
4th May 2007, 08:06 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,788
|
|
I didn't realise that could be done.
His calculation method must be different to the way the neurals do theirs. It strongly appears he is more generous to the higher fancied horses just as the PR algorithym is when on high settings. For example, on a setting of 3, the top selection was $5 yet when changed to a setting of 5, the top selection reduces to $2.90.
|