23rd May 2007, 07:34 AM
|
Suspended.
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by partypooper
G'day Crash, for most of the time you are probably right, but this plan is designed to improve from "BREAK EVEN" so I have it down as pretty safe, especially if the extra safety measures as I outlined are incorporated, so I see it as a bet to nothing, in the sense that if it performs as normal you will at least break even , if you do well then ,...you do better.
In fact it's not that far removed from 1% of bank (level stakes) never reducing, that has to be pretty conservative doesn't it?
|
Party,
I'm pretty sure it's fairly safe too. My point really is: TAB and Bookies have all the time in the world and even the most timid and [almost] safe progressive staking system will hit a long run of outs and go belly up. If it's that close to 1% of bank punting, why bother?
|