Hi Seeker,

Yes, I agree.

It's stupid because from what I can gather, it's simply a coding issue, which could be fixed in a few hours.

They tried to do something too advanced without trialling it first as a beta version.

With a site with so much traffic, whomever, oversees the internet side of things should be sacked and replaced immediately.

Or were they being dictated to and all recommendations ignored.

I think it's a case of "get up it running by such and such a date!"

The bottom line is BAD MANAGEMENT as usual.