![Old](images/statusicon/post_old.gif)
18th September 2003, 06:22 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Bundy
Posts: 292
|
|
Quote:
On 2003-09-18 17:01, Chrome Prince wrote:
Hi Dale,
Interesting idea you have there.
Here are the results based on your theory...
Hawkes trained runners only
Selections: 21
Winners: 5
Strike Rate: 23.81%
Profit: $22.90
POT:109.05%
Ave Div: $8.78
Too small a sample size to call, so here's the same for Gai Waterhouse...
Selections: 19
Winners: 3
Strike Rate: 15.79%
Profit: -$1.90
POT:-10.00%
Ave Div: $5.70
Not too bad, but here's Tony McEvoy...
Selections: 24
Winners: 4
Strike Rate: 16.67%
Profit: -$4.90
POT:-20.42%
Ave Div: $4.78
|
Good stuff Chrome i'm excited lol.
So that's 64 bets for a return of $80.10 hmmm.
Just to make sure these horses are the young horses resuming after their first campaign aren't they?
I'll be keeping a closer eye on them from now on and i'll go you halves in the glossy brouchures and ensuing fortune lol.
P.S.-could you check the results for these horses that have also won at the distance because i've got a feeling the middle distance and staying horses might be dragging the overall return down.
|