Silver_and_sand, G'day again, I must say all this dialogue is good, though I'm not sure who you are mixing me up with, hang on I'll quote myself [In short I agree with you, in the long term it's much better on the nerves to be betting levels, or at least say 1% of bank never reducing.

I do think Mad is into an area where there are possibilities though, I've never completed any extensive research but have noticed many cases where a nag is QUOTED odds on (Pre-post) and often wins at a greater odds or where the Top Fluc was much better. food for thought!]

If my mathes is correct I'd need a losing run of 100 to bust the bank wouldn't I? (still presuming 48%S/R and even 8% POT)