As I've suggested, perhaps the "experts" should select one horse per race that they believe offers the most value to punters. Most of the people who follow these tipsters are generally small punters who would prefer to support their favourite tipsters selection at 7/1 rather than 10/9.

Whilst I'm on the soapbox, it really annoys me that the ex-jockey tipsters on Sky always seem to say "The top three lookers in the mounting yard are............" 99 times out of 100 they coincidentally are the top three in the market, funny that?

I've seen many a "good looker" in the yard who couldn't run out of sight on a dark night!

Thanks fellas.