
25th September 2007, 12:40 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 31
|
|
Hi Partypooper...I was going on memory of the strike rate, but I searched around the house and finally found the records of the system test...I'm actualy glad you brought it up because, I'm sorry and embarrassed to say I made a stupid MISTAKE. I discovered that the system that I tested (back in 2002) that made $100,000 was actually used with another system and results are from both...sorry about that.
When I started this thread I forgot that I used both together...sorry again. I separated the two systems and ran it again on it's own...found that for the 6 months, the system (mentioned in this post) actually produced $28,492...which isn't to bad. Sorry again for the stuff up guys.
Heres the results:
64 selections for 23 wins
strike rate 34.93%
longest loosing run was 9.
|