data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57fcb/57fcb1a9330efbd90984ebd6f490023137853fad" alt="Old"
1st October 2003, 09:25 AM
|
Suspended.
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
|
|
Sportsnut,
The first four lines from both. However it is worth mentioning that as far as Zip goes the first four lines might include more than four runners as often there is 2 on the second line and 3 or 4 on the third line. Not often but worth mentioning.
Moe yesterday: 3 wins from the top rater, 2 wins from 2nd. 3 from 3rd. 1 fourth and a 5th that dead heated with a top rater [9 races].
There is a system there somewhere [useing both Zip and average prize money].
Add decent handicapping and it aint a bad way to go. I still look at all runners though in case I miss something. So I wouldn't call it a system.
Cheers.
Know what you are thinking there Two Dogs [and perhaps Sportsnut too], but sorry to say no it dosn't stand up all the time but it does most of the time. Enough to make a system out of it ? I have been working on it for some time. The top 4 Zip lines are the problem. They may include up to eight runners in larger fields. I have just been using them for hadicapping [with some success]. Been looking for another criteria to add to the mix. Any ideas ?
[ This Message was edited by: crash on 2003-10-01 10:38 ]
|