View Single Post
  #4  
Old 23rd December 2007, 02:51 PM
pengo pengo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 219
Default

Stupid forum restrictions... post continued here :P


Also, in race 1 the horse showing an open price of $4 came in 1st (its fixed is $5 and there was 1 other runner with an open of $4 but paid $6 fixed). In race 2 there was one other showing $4.xx in the open but less than $4 for fixed. With the winner showing an open of $4 and a fixed price of $4.80 (so within range [4-5]).

So that said, you might select a horse doing as follows:

1. City meet
2. Non-maiden
3. Minimum of 8 runners
4. IAS Open showing $4.xx but a fixed price of $4-$5.

In doing the above you would have 2 out of 3 winners for Seymour so far, with the selection being the 3rd placer for race 3.

FYI there is a horse showing odds of $26 for race 4, no 13 (Terrific value lets see if it holds up to its namesake! [update: nup guess not]).

Unsure if you would each way or just win bet, you would be 2 for 3 for win betting or 5 for 6 bets if doing each way.

Now further to all of that, in Race 4 there was no runner showing $4 but the winner was paying $6 (granted there was one other paying $6).

David Hayes has done alright today too, maybe put in a trainer restriction? For instance when it meets all off the mentioned criteria have the final criteria be that it has to be a horse trained by: Hayes, Freedman, Price, Laing, Ellerton or Moody (they seem to be the top vic trainers).
Reply With Quote