Quote:
|
For most systems/selection methods it will not work
|
Correct
Quote:
If you have a high enough strike rate and the odds show a loss at level stake you can make a profit ising a progressive staking plan.
|
Correct
Well written Wes.
If you were to line up 50 systems that were based on a good selection criteria, that was winning, on a unit for unit basis
V's
50 systems that were based on a selection criteria that couldnt win, on a unit for unit basis, & needed staking intervention to make profits.........
Then its obvious to say that when reporting back in 12months time the first 50 would still be there....as in all 50 of them making profit, 100% garuanteed.
Only probably a few of the 2nd 50 would be there, only because of street wiseness by the operator and a decent bank.
its not impossible as youve stated....it just lacks long jevity.
My beliefs from readings & hands on >> are those that use it only do so because they dont yet have a winning unit for unit system & although they know its risky have no other choice. Those that do have a unit for unit winning system will never, ever tread those waters.
The risk in staking / doubling up / retreiving .....is soley on a user pays system >>> if you have to use it to make profit u risk paying a hefty price. If you have a unit for unit system, you dont need it, then punting is very much a risk free environment.