data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57fcb/57fcb1a9330efbd90984ebd6f490023137853fad" alt="Old"
15th February 2008, 08:59 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 441
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelg
Yesterday at Ipswich race 7 the system snared the winner, quinella and trifecta, paying $23.10, $99 and $3,370.
But now looking at the Unitab divvies which paid $25.00, $209 and $6,150 I feel almost cheated. I have never seen exotic divvies double those of another state, and I have often compared them on the IAS website. And no, my minimum bets did not affect the pools.
I can accept that flexi-betting could affect the trifecta dividends, particularly the higher ones, but this does not apply to quinellas.
This is one time that you wish this forum would not censor expletives.
|
Ouch!!! I bet that does hurt. Quite strange though that it was UniTAB with the highest prices, usually when I'm testing a system, I use there prices because they are generally the lowest. So if someting make a profit using there prices, it should be even better at other TAB's or bookies.
|