View Single Post
  #22  
Old 31st March 2008, 09:48 AM
the sundance kid the sundance kid is offline
Suspended for unsolicited forum advertising
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 31
Default Would it be a fair assumption if....

Gday Silver and Sand

Will attempt to answer some of those points you raised....

31 winners from 85 selections
Average price per winner (return divided by 31) is 4/1
Highest priced winners 11.30 - 9.80 - 9.30
NSW just doesnt stack up - dont know why
Wetter tracks dont seem to affect the stats - some runners
win - some dont
Deleting l/s winner rule is a thought - although - I have always
preferred l/s winners to backing something with a form
line of 110 - but there could be a cut off line say l/s beaten no
more than 4 lengths or something like that - Ill check that out
Distance rule - horse more consistent over shorter course -
Tried it up to 1400m results dropped off
No 2yo races - thats an idea - Ill check that out

Just to confirm we are on the same page these are the selections for March
2008
2/3 Sshine Coast R6 Crystal Sentinel u/p
4/3 Port Lincoln R5 Cumquat 2nd
4/3 Port Lincoln R3 Peruvian 1st 9.80
6/3 Port Lincoln R5 Export Power1st 3.80
9/3 Stoney Creek R9 King Hoaks 1st 4.30
23/3 Sshine Coast R8 Slick Trick u/p

Cheers and good luck to all

s k
Reply With Quote