8th April 2008, 07:32 AM
|
|
Suspended.
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chrome Prince
Amazingly Fast is the worst, Heavy is nearly as good as Good.
Transitional tracks are the one's to steer clear of, Dead and Slow.
That's why I get confused to why the "Dead or worse" rule is often applied???
|
These claims must be based on the number of favorites winning[?] For heavy conditions there will be a lot of scratchings. It makes sense that less runners = more chance the fav. will win. The theory then is only ever back favorites and back them only on Heavy, Good or Fast tracks? |