Yesterday elsewhere I experienced an incident which will occupy a prominent place in my burgeoning scrap book.

In response to an implication that I was incapable of comprehending flat staking, I calculated flat staking of a modest $1,000 over the disclosed 2,000 bets at 35% S/R and 35% POT. An eye-opening $700,000 profit.

But that objective information was deleted, and today a Kelly Staking calculation met the same fate.

This means that certain people there can claim any S/R or POT they choose and remain protected from my objective observations.

Kinda' like those who pumped Davnet up to $3 billion before reality pricked.

Now by contrast from what I can see here Crash published his picks beforehand, then claimed a winner that was not there.

How can that be anything but an innocent oversight?

If you want to malevolently claim fictitious winning figures, then you don't publish picks beforehand which everyone can verify.

Instead you might just claim extravagant S/R + POT with no corroborating evidence, or go p57's celebrated route of having very fluid rules which only get disclosed after any long-shot bolts in.

The massive outrage over what was clearly no more than a mistake again says far more about the accusers than the target.