22nd April 2008, 08:12 AM
|
|
Suspended.
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by crash
The 'more accurate prices' seem to have only been in Melb.
Double figure odds winners and track condt. last Sat.
Eagle Farm [dead 5 bordering on slow going by the times and some Jockies]
MAJESTIC SIGHT 33.70
SONG OF HOPE 33.90
CARDIO 16.40
NUCLEAR MEDICINE 12.40
FABIARNA 13.90
OUR JANGLES 14.40
Rosehill [Heavy]
NUCLEAR SKY 11.30
BOOK OF KELLS 56.40
ESKIMO QUEEN 18.00
VALEDICTUM 11.10
Caulfield [good 3]
Nil
Repeat: Bookies love wet tracks.
|
Yeah, breeding is a clue but how many punters know what are good or bad wet track sires? Even then it doesn't always apply [Tarzan's bother drowned in the bath]. It certainly never helped the average punter much on Sat. and where does Chrome's wet = 'more accurate prices' kick in? Only on the 'good'
at Caulfield strangely enough. |