ALL Selections are based on the rules.
Wunfluova claims the system has made a 'massive loss' [earlier post] over the time it has been running. My results and another poster who has checked them, agreed with my system results [approx 33% profit] and obviously based on selections that passed the rules.

I would tolerate that my figures might be slightly out depending on the TAB results used, but 'massive loss' implies total skull-duggery and basically lying and incredible 'creative accounting' for a system that my Grandmother could check the results on. She would also note any horses that didn't pass the rules.

Obviously, between my 33% profit and Wunfluova's 'massive loss' implies his rules for this system have nothing to do with my system's rules. 'Not accused of cooking the books' ? I'd call it innuendo saying exactly that as his observations and my results are a massive devide.

As far as I'm concerned this thread of mine is now closed, at least for me. Any more systems I come up with I'll keep to myself. Why bother?