View Single Post
  #15  
Old 26th September 2008, 10:31 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,437
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfc
Completely wrong.

Actually the evidence suggests this could be the biggest topical story since the launch of exchange betting.

Your claimed modus operandi indicates you would be considered a trader. As should every intelligent person using Betfair.

If those threatening to go elsewhere had done so in the past, Betfair's monopoly would be broken, and we would not have this debacle inflicted on us.


I didn't say it wasn't topical jfc, but for example the number of posts over at BF itself suggests extreme overkill over the whole situation.
If those threatening to go elsewhere had done so now, Betfair's monopoly would be broken, and of course it won't be for any long period.

"and we would not have this debacle inflicted on us."

So it's their fault???

It's simple really, whether it's right, is another argument.

They will give punters a better opportunity to win, providing they pay the same as a losing punter, if they pay less, they can expect to pay more for the privilege of winning.
Whatever the situation, it should be Betscared because 90% of deserters, would have been unaffected despite their claims that they would.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 426,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/10/2025
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote