data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57fcb/57fcb1a9330efbd90984ebd6f490023137853fad" alt="Old"
29th September 2008, 08:13 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 368
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrome Prince
What I mean by full commission is not the commission rate, nor the actual dollars paid at the end, I mean something a bit different.
Punters pay commission on losing winning bets, traders do not.
Yeah it sounds weird but I'll try and explain it as I understand it.
Punter A has 100 bets of $100, turning over $10,000
He makes $2,000 profit.
He does not pay 5% commission on just the $2,000 he won, he pays commission on every individual winning bet along the way.
He might have a lot of winning bets, but still only win $2,000.
So he's paid probably $200 in commission at the very least.
Trader B has 100 trades of $100, turning over $10,000
He makes $2,000 profit
He pays commission on his winning trades only, so probably $100 in commission because almost all his trades are winning trades, but small dribbles of profit every trade (nearly).
The punter has paid "full" commission, the trader will probably pay half commission plus a very fat premium charge now.
I hope I explained it enough, it's hard to put into words, but they have everyone running for cover, and most are not even hunted.
|
Yep under stand that Chrome
Trader A would pay $600 (at 5%) commission he would have to win $12000 , all bets in different races.
Trader B has his bets in one race wins the same amount as trader A $2000 and only has to pay $100 commission
So what Betfair are saying is that Trader B isn't covering the cost that is incurred on Betfair for his 100 bets, this is why the new charge.
|