30th September 2008, 03:22 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Sydney
Posts: 402
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Crackone
So what Betfair are saying is that Trader B isn't covering the cost that is incurred on Betfair for his 100 bets, this is why the new charge.
|
Actually Betfair are not saying anything remotely like your claim.
You apparently have missed the part where Betfair reveal what covering the cost really means.
Now if you study the situation there is no valid reason to suggest that Trader B costs Betfair more than Punter A.
Loser C who very rarely gets a bet matched but wastes tons of resources might actually cost much more. |