17th November 2008, 12:08 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,070
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Hammers
After taking in some of your thoughts I reckon a bet size of 1% of max bank level with a strike rate of 30 odd % seems conservative enough to weather the worst of bad runs yet positive enough to enable worthwhile growth. A bank such as this would have reached $14719 today after starting with $1000 39 days ago.
|
Hammers,
And there in lies the problem with paper testing. Growth like this is very hard to achieve in reality. Other factors come in to play before a lofty goal like that can be reached. I agree with my fellow Punterati - there is no substitute for real money.
You may get something from these
http://www.propun.com.au/racing_for...11&postcount=46
http://www.propun.com.au/racing_for...71&postcount=55
__________________
Pixie "It's worth remembering that profit isn't profit until it's spent off the racecourse." -- Crash
|