7th February 2009, 12:23 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,070
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by crazyjord
If you notice adelaide has 4 races in a row,i never personally liked backing more than 2 races in a row because the chance of them all winning would be very slim.
If the system selects them i suppose you have to back them.
I know you only need 1 of them to win to cover the other's if they lose but what are your thoughts.
Do your systems have a runner in every race at some meetings?
How many winner's in a row have you had at a single meeting?
|
Huh?? 
Crazy that logic really doesn't make sense. The result of one race has no effect on the result of another. That's the Gamblers Fallacy. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamblers_fallacy
__________________
Pixie "It's worth remembering that profit isn't profit until it's spent off the racecourse." -- Crash
|