25th May 2009, 10:08 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 94
|
|
Pauls123,
About 10 years ago I tried using times, but I didn't go into it in the depth you did. crash brings up the pitfalls I saw, and you seem to take them into consideration. I found times were more useful a longer term tool. Times for 2 and 3 year olds were very indicative of their future class, often. When everyone was raving about Nothin' Leica Dane, I was saying it will be Octagonal that really has the big career, based on sectional times. I was right back then quite often about things like that.
As a predictor for a race I found it less accurate for the reasons already given.
|