Not sure of the pitch here Bhagwan but could you explain that 90% bit again and why the need to find 6 contenders [6 to price]?

I frame my market to 80% for the usual 3 or 4 contenders I come up with which might work out as 5/2 for my top pick and 7/2, 5/1, 6/1 for the others. My bet is usualy the runner with the best value compared to tote/bookie and may include backing two of the longer priced runners due to value and/or field size.

Is there a point in taking on a race that has more than 4 possible contenders that need pricing unless it is for exotic betting ? Most races seem to come down to 3/4 contenders after handicapping. 6 contenders [6 horses with winning claims] would be hard to find. Does your method here only target those races ?

Cheers.


[ This Message was edited by: crash on 2003-11-25 16:41 ]