Thread: Coincidence
View Single Post
  #6  
Old 23rd July 2009, 08:27 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,788
Wink

Yes, Bhagwan, I think you're right, I think so far its been lucky. However I'll still privately monitor it...you never know. Pity I didn't back the method today - however, if I did they would probably then have lost.

Interestingly, when I was testing the method I discovered it had been more profitable to omit barrier no.1 and substitute it with the next barrier past the mid-point number, but decided not to proceed with it as there had only been slightly over 100 races. If I had done this today then it would have selected no.11 at Townsville race 3 which paid $55.00.

By the way, there were 11 and not 7 races today - my mistake.
Reply With Quote