29th July 2009, 06:33 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 47
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by moeee
What you have got wrong is that you are having an equal amount on your winners as you are on your losers.
Wouldn't it make more sense to have more on your winning selections than on your losing selections?
Yesterday I Posted 4 selections.
Following my bet amounts, I would have invested $55 for a return of just over $60.
With your approach, an equal share would have invested about $15 on each animal for a return of $30.
Sure this is just one day out of History, and perhaps tomorrow things could work out in Favour of your idea.
But just to show you that things can be improved on, otherwise we'ld still be rubbing sticks together to get the barbie going.
Simple ain't always better.
|
I guess the simplicity of my staking does come from the fact that I don't know whether it's a winner or loser until after the result...so I guess your statement/offer is probably a bit simplistic...so are you talking about a stake which is based around a target which is re-adjusted after each result [as in increases with every loser?]
If you don't want to go into the full explanation can you post a link? I'm always open to offers.
I'm assuming [maybe wrongly] that your plan will win more on the winning days but lose more on the losing days?
|