
28th December 2003, 10:53 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Yarra Valley
Posts: 241
|
|
On 2003-12-28 09:48, GeneralGym wrote:
STEBBO
"The point I was trying to make (albeit badly) was that betting a fixed takeout doesn't change the odds or the risk. GG's implication (or at least the way I read it) was that betting a fixed takeout somehow changed the odds / risk situation."
I'm definatly not implying that.
The odds about a horse only makes for a rosier result (should it be a winning bet) as the risk is the same whether the horse is the odds on pop or 100/1+.
Hello GG,
I'm curious as to how you define "risk" for this statement to be true????
Cheers,
Chris.
|