![Old](images/statusicon/post_old.gif)
8th March 2010, 07:04 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,788
|
|
Bhagwan, I've thought once more about sprints with the CP and JT algorithyms.
Using the method there were some high liability close-calls in sprints so out of curiousity I've reversed the method, and the results are surprising. The rules I used are:
1) Maximum distance of 1,250 metres.
2) Lay the highest-points selection with the CP and JT algorithyms.
3) The top selection must not have a total of 60 points or more.
4) No Black Type races.
5) No NTD races.
For rule 3 there were 5 selections at 60 or more points - 2 won and the other three placed.
For rule 4 I don't feel comfortable laying the best horse in top-class races and also often ridden by one of the best jockeys.
Over the past three days there have been 43 races for 4 accidents with a total liability of $8.60 on NSWTAB.
This is an amazing success strike rate as the vast majority of the selections started at single figures.
|