
13th January 2004, 12:21 PM
|
Suspended.
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
|
|
Chrome and Good 4th.,
I can assure you that there will not be enough selections to break any bank [ unless the punter is stupid enough to start rolling over loss days ] and you won't end up on favorites all the time either. I didn't, but I only used it on Sat. Metro mostly.
Any system you choose can be used of course, so I have added this obvious point to my original post and put the 'strongly' in my advice against ' rolling over losses ' in capitals. Loosing days weren't common enough to wipe out profits or they didn't when I used this method anyway. I just got bored with it as my leaning was toward handicapping mostly.
I wrote :
'...providing a small group of strong chances' at whatever meeting you are at or following. You might get 2 or 3 selections but even for 4 selections and they all loose, your bets would be [ for for convenience sake say they were all 4/1 ]: 1. $25 2. $31 3. $39 4. $49 Total $144 compared to $100 flat stakes.
Even 5 loosing bets would only be a total of $205 bet versus $125 flat stake. Hardly bank breaking figures.
The rollover option was only included so I could recommend against it, as readers will think of it themselves whether I mentioned it or not.
Cheers.
[ This Message was edited by: crash on 2004-01-14 06:12 ]
|