23rd April 2010, 09:34 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,012
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by partypooper
STIX, I offer this reply purely from LONG TERM observations, 98 bets is nothing you need more like 9,800 bets to evaluate a selection method. I'm not having a go at you, you may well have cracked it, it's just that so many times I thought I had, only to fall in a crumpled heap, even my most revered place method that I have been operating for alomost 6 years has seen some VERY scary moments, thankfully it has always recovered (SO FAR) to hover around the 4% POT mark. (always getting the best possible return,) I doubt if many would have persevered!!!
|
By the selection method's very nature Party, I'd be 157 yo by the time I had that history.
I know where you are comming from, but it just not applicable/possible here. Thanks for your reply, always appreciate your input.
__________________
Stix
.......Giddy Up..... !!
|