16th June 2010, 09:24 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TWOBETS
I also believe that if one is expecting to live off the profits of punting, then staking variables should only be considered once a system has proved itself profitable at level stakes.
|
Could not agree more
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TWOBETS
“it is impossible to make money with under priced horses”
While I agree that this is usually the case, the above concept is far too simplistic. Bring on the shorties !.......
|
Given the way we can calculate the price BEFORE the race, how can one accurately tell whether a horse is unders or overs in general?
We can't, not really with any great accuracy!
It all depends on the type of ratings used, that's why for instance you get different prices from the Neural rating, using either Don Scott's ratings or neural ratings
The best is to stick to one set of ratings and use that all the time for assessing unders and overs.
Provided of course that the rating has some merit in the first place.
This is actually the answer to the question Stix posed on an other thread, that is there are no accurate pre-post prices, one maybe better that others but in the end it's best to just use one rating you are happiest with and stick to it.
|