
18th September 2010, 09:34 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 58
|
|
Ok I have a backfitted system
It was backfitted and designed around sensible rules..
It doesn't have a lot of selections..
Let's say it's back fitted over two years of data. Year one shows 28% POT with a s/r of 32.4%. Year two shows 42% POT with a s/r of 33.3%. The profit over two years is 6.5 times the largest dividend.
When broken into equal time amounts five show profit, and three show a loss however one loss is within one unit.
Without going into amount of selections but assessing on the fact it's a two year study. Yes backfitted but if was designed two years ago and applied the same results would have been achieved...
Basically I want to have a educated punt and I'm looking for someone to tell me why this would be a bad idea???
Winner winner chicken dinner!
|