
29th September 2010, 05:02 PM
|
|
Suspended
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
|
|
I'm sorry Bonecrusher.
I didn't realize your selections were based on zero knowledge.
Did you know that most winning Punters are winning Punters because they know more than the losing Punters?
I don't know that.But I assume it because it makes sense .
I just read your 5 Rules.
The only thing you have going for you is oif the rules will seperate the Overbet animals from the Underbet ones.
Rule 1 is useful because Don Scott and others have suggested that the best Value bets are around the 3 to 1 Mark.
But not enough to make a Profit.You must get the best Odds available to do that.
Rule 2 appears to increase the strike rate , but not necessarily introduce an increase in Profit.
In fact I suggest it may well decrease the Profit, because uninformed money tends to fall on animals with good latest form.
Rule 3 again increases the strike rate, but many database sorter-outerers have found the middle boxes tend to show less of a loss due to the higher dividends.Middle Boxes are very unfashionable.
Rule 4 again increases the strike rate with perhaps no increase in Profit.
Good Luck with your system Bonecrusher.
But in these days of Computers and Databases, winning systems like these that were around in the old Olympic Park Days, may have worked, but I feel you will end up with a minimum loss of turnover of the current take-out which is $15 in every $100 bet.
Cheers.
|