View Single Post
  #3  
Old 7th February 2004, 10:17 AM
Felicity Felicity is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Canberra
Posts: 26
Default

Quote:
On 2004-02-07 10:54, hermes wrote:
True, but one of the reasons for this - if not the reason - is simply that you tend to have bigger fields in later races: that's the whole reasoning behind this plan.


10 yrs data, all dists all going all days all trax .......... avg. field sizes are :-

R1...9
R2...9
R3...9
R4...9
R5..10
R6..10
R7..11
R8..12

cheers
Reply With Quote