Hi, kumite.

Yes, it's regardless how the horse performed in that run. I haven't looked at any filters apart from the 11 days gap because the results in the testing period were so strong. Of course someone may think of a rule/filter that improves the results.

Yes, one can easily assume that run had more bearing than the 12 month period. But I don't really know how the rankings are calculated - maybe whoever does the calcs make no distinction from a race run 11 months ago against a race run last week, or if the more recent the race then the higher it is viewed which is consequently factored into the calculations?

From tomorrow I'll identify those selections that placed at its last start. Interestingly, the two winners today placed at their previous start, but I'll also be betting on the unplaced ones because I might miss some good priced placegetters.

Time will tell...