Thanks for the method, wesmip1.

Shouldn't the positive expectation be 89%, which is very high seeing that all the selections are at single figures, and the results from the past 3 months are very impressive. Just for comparison, is it possible to look at the results assuming the selections had been layed for the same stake ($20?), and not to a liability of $100?

The combined ranking of 21 - I assume it is a minimum of 21.

To have a very low rating in the CF algorithym would more or less mean the selection is resuming from a spell. I have always been uncomfortable laying these, but maybe the poor record of the trainer compensates for this. Have you looked at replacing the CF category with CP or another category?

From today I'll have a look at your method, and if there are any selections I'll lay them.