Hi Dale,
The breakdown per Trainer was:-
BART CUMMINGS
<= $4 8 bets 6 wins (So You Think won 4, Precedence won 2)
>$4 to $7 4 bets 1 win
>$7 to $10 6 bets 0 wins
>$10 to $21 15 bets 0 wins
PETER MOODY
<= $4 15 bets 9 wins
>$4 to $7 17 bets 7 wins
>$7 to $10 11 bets 1 win
>$10 to $21 14 bets 1 win
MARK KAVANAGH
<= $4 6 bets 2 wins
>$4 to $7 17 bets 1 win
>$7 to $10 8 bets 1 win
>$10 to $21 11 bets 1 win
MICK PRICE
<= $4 6 bets 2 wins
>$4 to $7 9 bets 0 wins
>$7 to $10 7 bets 0 wins
>$10 to $21 5 bets 0 wins
PETER SNOWDEN
= $4 10 bets 4 wins
>$4 to $7 21 bets 4 wins
>$7 to $10 7 bets 0 wins
>$10 to $21 11 bets 0 wins
Interestingly,
In the >$10 to $21 bracket there were 56 bets for 2 winners totaling $31.80
In the >$7 to $10 bracket there were 39 bets for 2 winners totaling $28.80
In the >$4 to $7 bracket there were 68 bets for 13 winners totaling $82.40
In the <=$4 bracket there were 45 bets for 23 winners totaling $64.20
This certainly indicates I could have made a bigger profit if the price brackets >$7 to $10 and >$10 to #21 had been ignored.
The overall results would have been:-
113 bets 36 winners (S/R 33.0%) collect $146.60 (if betting 1 unit on each selection) Profit = $33.60 POT% = 29.7%
If following my initial betting plan
Outlay = 4x45 + 3x68 = $384
Collect = 4x$64.20 + 3x$82.40 = $504
Profit = $120
POT % = 31.2%
Dale, I appreciate you asking the question as it has made me look more closely at the raw numbers and if I took this approach again at following Trainers over a carnival I would only consider horses with opening prices <=$7
|