Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lomaca
fair enough Stix, although it wasn't made clear in your post, specially since you were looking for data from May and June last year, indicating that you have at least a year's worth of data.
I'm sorry I jumped to conclusions, it's always dangerous.
|
Yeah, my bad.
I actually gave up the neural last year as there didn't seem to be too many willing to assist, so wrongly or rightly, I thought it wasn't worth my time persuing...but now I have some promising (but limited) results.
I was just going through some extra analysis of the data I have and started looking at tracks POT and S/R for (my filtered) top raters, so not all top raters and found those track so far have performed well away from the mean.
I'm not looking at WA or TAS venues, but past experience says they don't perform well.
NSW venues, seems to be the most inconsistent with Metro, Provincial and country meetings as a group throwing up surprising numbers on the low side, but can be "massaged" with filters and dropping a few tracks, particularly the lower level country venues.
SA venues also seem to be very inconsistent and even with filters, I struggle to find a viable method.
Vic and Qld are reasonable, with some larger dividends being found in QLD, the Gold Coast track and neurals appear to be a natural fit for laying
Geelong synthetic also appears to not be viable at al with (filtered) top raters.
Anyway, just some of my observations from the inital two month results.
Hope to find my old data base and go over the same filters to see any "
sands of time" type movements
All the best.
Anyone want to drop me a line on neurals, would be appreciated via pro_pun @ aanet dot com dot au