28th February 2011, 01:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,091
|
|
I’ve read 70 pages and made notes, and I’ve got to say there are some absolute gems hidden in amongst the hundreds of thousands of words.
So far, all bar a couple of the systems posted have been proven to have a LOT.
Some of the “undisputed givens in racing” such as weight and bad barriers might be insignificant in your assessment of a horse’s chances, and conversely, might actually add value.
Most of the ratings lead to the top few in the betting, and the value / advantage to be gained that may have once been there, is no longer there.
There appears to be only a few decent filters that may improve the SR without decreasing the POT.
Are the stats you’re looking at relevant ? Stats can be made to show exactly what you want to see and need to be treated with caution.
A selection method is probably better that a mechanical system.
|