18th May 2011, 11:33 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lomaca
Just one question, why did you have No 7 so far down?
It was my sole selection. No 3 had no chance at all in this race that is!
That is all I'm saying, no more correspondence.
You should be rolling in money if you knew how to bet, like a friend of mine, he sure can pick 'em but he ignores them!
You prepare an a'la cart menu and then go smorgasbord.
I sincerely wish you Good luck.
|
Sorry, in case you are wondering what I'm talking about,
No 7 is the best in distance in this race not bad in class, has adequate early speed, (even if not the best), reasonable time rating and most importantly its recent form is encouraging.
By recent form being encouraging, I mean it's improving, while the No 3 as a last time winner is hard pressed for improvement.
All things considered they are fairly well matched, bar for the potential improvement of the 7.
Then comes the price of course, and don't the bookies just love to make a dog or horse the fave, when they too, know better, eh?
Cheers
|