2nd June 2011, 08:51 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 696
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by moeee
So if I get a sample of 100 Races, and just supposing we accept that it is a representative sample, even though 100 ain't enough in the REAL World, should all my animals , when grouped in Order of MY Favouritism , be showing similar losses if I have done a good job of handicapping?
Or should My top selections be showing a Profit, based on the Odds I calculated, with a progressively worse result as I go down my list?
Or should I not concentrate on Profits and Losses , and just confine myself to the percentage of Winners, as you described in your very first post giving me advice?
|
you measure your ratings by how many winners, you should have a smooth transition right down to rank 6,7-8 who may blend together.
1=32%, 2=21% 3=15% and so on down to the lowest rank, |