Thread: A Theory ...
View Single Post
  #28  
Old 2nd July 2011, 10:19 AM
beton beton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 589
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vortech
My statistics are very basic by taking starting price which normally equate to around 140% of the market. By race start its around 115% to compete with TOTE. Often had much debate over what is a plunge or a market mover when the variables are often so different.

Its all find to follow the leaders until they walk off the cliff.

Over my many years of laying and picking winners etc etc etc, I now only work on around 12 systems which focus on an average of 4 picks per race with a return of 76% winners from the four. Use this system on Quads and you normally get around 25-30%.

The variable I use the most is the Starting Price as its the best.
The next is a good free rating systems. Often different ratings work better in different states so I have a mix.

From a $10 investment on the quad you'll get around $40-$80 payout, but every 3 months a big one will come along and collect $100 - $500.

Of late, with a S/R of 76% I've been putting a $10 bet on any races with 2 or less horses selected. Good returns from Jan 11 but early days.

Any one interested in the rules or selections this weekend let me know.

I think its a little unique, something that you need from the rest.


Vortech
Hello. I am confuseded (actually being in the state of being confused) You state that you take the starting price. Is not the starting price the price at jump once the betting has stopped and been adjusted? And you posted the picks last night. So what market do you begin with? And what are your selection rules so that we can understand what you are eluding to? Other than this thank you for posting the selections Beton
Reply With Quote