OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums - View Single Post - Neural Data Help

Thanks Bhags, I've got a method already which picks up selections using Neurals and 100 pt raters, which is doing well since I started in October last year - and thanks to some of Wesmips data he provided - but he's gone AWOL...

Often on a lazy Sunday will look at top two neural raters and "normalise" the CF and CP figures to get a selection. For example Top rater has 185 points (CF 80 CP 15) and 2nd Rater has 130 pts (CF 20 CP 25) - i look at the combined CF and CP points (95 vs 45) where there is a big discrepancy between two values - in this case CF points - I look at the 2nd rate and if it's CF was 80, would it out rate the original top rater, which it would in this case (130-20+80=210) then it becomes the selection.

This works pretty good and don't have too many races before you hit a winner, small staking plan until a winner hit and then either stop or start again...anyway again something to think about and play around with.

I was looking at TA and JA setting in conjuction with Unitab and got some decent priced winners, although Sunday was not the best day...

Anyway if someone has the TA & JA settings for any period of time, it would be appreciated!!

Be Good...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bhagwan

I dabbled with that setting some time ago & what I found is that it went really well for some days, then fell into a total hole other days .

Very hot & cold.

I found the std settings worked as well as anything else.

With some very good paying winners.

Looking at the Neural forum , a lot of the chaps seem to compare their various settings with one another , on how well their top 2 selections performed as a combined percentage, so as to judge whether their settings had any legs or not.

Rather than just relying on their top selection only.

I feel if one wants to get the best out of the Neurals , I found its a good idea to target the top 2 of whatever favourite Neural setting one is using.

Then separate those top 2, using ones favoured separation method & go from there.

The separation method does not necessarily have to be all that logical, if it's shown to perform in the past, that way , the better payers can be snared.

Try & keep the separation process as simple as possible.
That way it has a greater chance of repeating itself into the future.